Evidence of innate immune dysfunction in first-episode psychosis patients with accompanying mood disorder - Journal of Neuroinflammation

Belgique Nouvelles Nouvelles

Evidence of innate immune dysfunction in first-episode psychosis patients with accompanying mood disorder - Journal of Neuroinflammation
Belgique Dernières Nouvelles,Belgique Actualités
  • 📰 BioMedCentral
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 26 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 71%

A study published in the Journal of Neuroinflammation suggests that immune dysfunction in affective psychosis may differ from that of primary psychotic disorders, and inflammation may be associated with increased negative symptoms.

]). The majority of patients were taking antipsychotic medications, which were converted to chlorpromazine equivalent dose to assess relative antipsychotic potencies. Participants were excluded for positive urine toxicology at the time of testing, alcohol or drug abuse/dependence within three months of assessment, and/or a Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence IQ score that was below 70.

To assess PBMC response to stimulation, supernatants from PBMC cultures were quantified via multiplex analysis using a high sensitivity Luminex bead set for innate inflammatory cytokines IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-15 TNF-α,TNF-β, and interferon -α2, inflammatory chemokines Eotaxin, IL-8, IFNγ inducible protein , monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 , and macrophage inflammatory protein 1-beta , T helper cell 1 -associated cytokines IFNγ, IL-2, IL-12, and IL-12, T17 associated cytokine IL-17,...

Nous avons résumé cette actualité afin que vous puissiez la lire rapidement. Si l'actualité vous intéresse, vous pouvez lire le texte intégral ici. Lire la suite:

BioMedCentral /  🏆 22. in UK

Belgique Dernières Nouvelles, Belgique Actualités

Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.

CanRisk-Prostate: A Comprehensive, Externally Validated Risk Model for the Prediction of Future Prostate Cancer | Journal of Clinical OncologyCanRisk-Prostate: A Comprehensive, Externally Validated Risk Model for the Prediction of Future Prostate Cancer | Journal of Clinical OncologyPURPOSE Prostate cancer (PCa) is highly heritable. No validated PCa risk model currently exists. We therefore sought to develop a genetic risk model that can provide personalized predicted PCa risks on the basis of known moderate- to high-risk pathogenic variants, low-risk common genetic variants, and explicit cancer family history, and to externally validate the model in an independent prospective cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed a risk model using a kin-cohort comprising individuals from 16,633 PCa families ascertained in the United Kingdom from 1993 to 2017 from the UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study, and complex segregation analysis adjusting for ascertainment. The model was externally validated in 170,850 unaffected men (7,624 incident PCas) recruited from 2006 to 2010 to the independent UK Biobank prospective cohort study. RESULTS The most parsimonious model included the effects of pathogenic variants in BRCA2, HOXB13, and BRCA1, and a polygenic score on the basis of 268 common low-risk variants. Residual familial risk was modeled by a hypothetical recessively inherited variant and a polygenic component whose standard deviation decreased log-linearly with age. The model predicted familial risks that were consistent with those reported in previous observational studies. In the validation cohort, the model discriminated well between unaffected men and men with incident PCas within 5 years (C-index, 0.790; 95% CI, 0.783 to 0.797) and 10 years (C-index, 0.772; 95% CI, 0.768 to 0.777). The 50% of men with highest predicted risks captured 86.3% of PCa cases within 10 years. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first validated risk model offering personalized PCa risks. The model will assist in counseling men concerned about their risk and can facilitate future risk-stratified population screening approaches.
Lire la suite »

Police warning after 'selfish and mindless' fire attack on speed cameraPolice warning after 'selfish and mindless' fire attack on speed cameraAn attack on a speed camera that was swallowed up by flames will have 'no impact' on any evidence of speeding that has been recorded on it, unimpressed officials say.
Lire la suite »

Hoping the public side with ‘reasonable Rishi’ over striking workers is a risky strategy for PMHoping the public side with ‘reasonable Rishi’ over striking workers is a risky strategy for PMThe Prime Minister's position has hardened against the unions this week - but there is not yet evidence that the public are with him
Lire la suite »

Risk factors for severe Covid-19 breakthrough infections: an observational longitudinal study - BMC Infectious DiseasesRisk factors for severe Covid-19 breakthrough infections: an observational longitudinal study - BMC Infectious DiseasesBackground The drive to vaccinate large populations is nowadays the main instrument for combating the pandemic and preventing serious disease and death. However, breakthrough infection (post-vaccination infection) still happens after vaccination among fully vaccinated people. We aimed to assess the severity outcomes and to determine its associated factors among vaccinated COVID-19 cases in the governorate of Sousse, Tunisia. Methods We carried out a five-month observational longitudinal study including all the population of Sousse. Confirmed infections of SARS-CoV-2 and the vaccination status are recorded in the daily COVID- 19 database of the Regional Office of the Tunisian Ministry of Health. We included all post-vaccination COVID-19 cases for the analysis of the COVID-19 serious outcomes. Data were collected via 15-min telephonic call interviews conducted by trained interviewers. Descriptive analysis with calculating incidence rates of confirmed COVID-19 cases per 100,000 inhabitants was conducted. In binary logistic regression, adjusted odds ratios along with 95% intervals confidence were performed to determine factors related to severe or critical COVID-19. Results As of 31 July 2021, 107,545 persons over 19 years old have received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination. Among the vaccinated population, we traced and included 765 breakthrough infection cases, and the incidence rate was 711.3 per week. The majority were female (sex-ratio = 0.8), and the average age of the overall cases was 55.7 years. The prevalence of severe or critical cases in vaccinated COVID-19 patients occurs in 10.8% of cases. Patients with a medical history of cardiovascular diseases had more than two times increased odds to have a severe or critical disease. We also found the highest self-estimation of adherence to preventive measures was inversely correlated to serious cases and having an incomplete vaccination schema was strongly associated with complications. Conclusions We tried
Lire la suite »

Association between cervical artery dissection and spinal manipulative therapy –a medicare claims analysis - BMC GeriatricsAssociation between cervical artery dissection and spinal manipulative therapy –a medicare claims analysis - BMC GeriatricsBackground Cervical artery dissection and subsequent ischemic stroke is the most serious safety concern associated with cervical spinal manipulation. Methods We evaluated the association between cervical spinal manipulation and cervical artery dissection among older Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. We employed case-control and case-crossover designs in the analysis of claims data for individuals aged 65+, continuously enrolled in Medicare Part A (covering hospitalizations) and Part B (covering outpatient encounters) for at least two consecutive years during 2007–2015. The primary exposure was cervical spinal manipulation; the secondary exposure was a clinical encounter for evaluation and management for neck pain or headache. We created a 3-level categorical variable, (1) any cervical spinal manipulation, 2) evaluation and management but no cervical spinal manipulation and (3) neither cervical spinal manipulation nor evaluation and management. The primary outcomes were occurrence of cervical artery dissection, either (1) vertebral artery dissection or (2) carotid artery dissection. The cases had a new primary diagnosis on at least one inpatient hospital claim or primary/secondary diagnosis for outpatient claims on at least two separate days. Cases were compared to 3 different control groups: (1) matched population controls having at least one claim in the same year as the case; (2) ischemic stroke controls without cervical artery dissection; and (3) case-crossover analysis comparing cases to themselves in the time period 6–7 months prior to their cervical artery dissection. We made each comparison across three different time frames: up to (1) 7 days; (2) 14 days; and (3) 30 days prior to index event. Results The odds of cervical spinal manipulation versus evaluation and management did not significantly differ between vertebral artery dissection cases and any of the control groups at any of the timepoints (ORs 0.84 to 1.88; p | 0.05). Results for carotid a
Lire la suite »



Render Time: 2025-03-28 18:56:06