Scottish government cannot hold an independence referendum without UK government’s consent, the Supreme Court has ruled
The court unanimously ruled that the Scottish Government does not have the legal power to call a second vote. Lord Reed said: "The Scottish Parliament does not have the power to legislate for a referendum on independence.
”The Scottish government had hoped to hold indyref2 on October 19 next year.Belgique Dernières Nouvelles, Belgique Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Scottish independence: Supreme Court to rule on referendum caseThe court was asked to clarify whether the Scottish government can hold indyref2 without Westminster consent.
Lire la suite »
What you need to know as Supreme court to rule on second Scottish independence referendumThe Supreme Court will rule today on whether the Scottish Parliament has the right to announce a new referendum on independence without the approval of the UK Government Here's what you need to know ⤵️
Lire la suite »
IndyRef2: Second Scottish independence referendum needs Westminster's approval, Supreme Court rulesScotland cannot hold a second independence referendum without first getting the approval of the UK government, Supreme Court judges have ruled.
Lire la suite »
Supreme Court rules against Scottish Government in IndyRef2 caseJudges in London have issued a 'unanimous' decision against the Scottish Government plan for a second referendum.
Lire la suite »
Scottish independence supporters plan rallies after Supreme Court verdictJudges will issue a ruling on Wednesday on whether the Scottish Government can stage an IndyRef2 without prior agreement from Westminster.
Lire la suite »
Indyref2: Why is the Supreme Court ruling on a Scottish independence referendum and what could happen?Nicola Sturgeon is pushing for a second independence referendum but the UK government will not give Scotland the authority to hold a vote, so it is now down to Supreme Court justices.
Lire la suite »