Letters: The planned abolition of the £20 uplift is the latest attack on claimants caught in an unfair benefits system, says Mark Newbury. Plus letters from Jane Middleton and Manuela Gonnermann
Your editorial is correct in highlighting the link between access to affordable social housing and childcare as a determining factor in childhood poverty. But with its focus on the imminent removal of the £20 per week uplift, it does not address two structural issues relating to universal credit. First, help with housing costs is restricted.
Belgique Dernières Nouvelles, Belgique Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
The Guardian view on benefit cuts: the fight against poverty is on | EditorialEditorial: A U-turn on the £20 universal credit cut is unlikely. But a new battle to protect low-income households has begun
Lire la suite »
Inflation is back, but Sunak is determined to take money out of our pocketsAnalysis: Britain faces a cut in universal credit, a public sector pay freeze and a rise in national insurance contributions
Lire la suite »
Boris Johnson won’t say how Universal Credit claimants can recoup lost £20-a-weekA Cabinet minister wrongly claimed they need work only 2 extra hours – but prime minister fails to give true answer
Lire la suite »
Millions on Universal Credit and other benefits to get Christmas bonusHARD-UP Brits could get a bonus this Christmas if they are claiming certain benefits. The cash could be a big help for anyone left struggling after Universal Credit is cut at the end of this month.…
Lire la suite »
Letters: Decision not to introduce vaccine passports is a grave errorPlease send your letters to lettersindependent.co.uk
Lire la suite »
Aussie TV star makes epic blunder while reporting on cricketer's 'bulging disc'Absolute television gold 😂
Lire la suite »