Why the BBC presenter behind sex photo claims isn't being named by the media 🔎 Analysis by elle_odwyer
Breaching rights to privacy is also a central concern. A landmark ruling at the Supreme Court in 2022, Bloomberg v ZXC, means someone is entitled to privacy if they are under a criminal investigation but have not yet been formally charged and sent to the courts, Mr Kuncewicz said.
Mark Stephens, media law expert and partner at Howard Kennedy, said there was “a second layer of privacy” at issue here, the “contractual arrangement” between the BBC and its members of staff. “That’s doesn’t matter whether you’re a celebrity or in the local office or on the building site, the same law applies.
Mr Stephens said that this “second layer of privacy” was preventing the BBC from defending the innocent presenters from being named.
Belgique Dernières Nouvelles, Belgique Actualités
Similar News:Vous pouvez également lire des articles d'actualité similaires à celui-ci que nous avons collectés auprès d'autres sources d'information.
Why hasn't the BBC presenter at the centre of the allegations been named publicly?Without public evidence and more information, news outlets wanting to name the star who has had allegations levelled at him could find themselves jumping over legal hurdles.
Lire la suite »
BBC responds after star accused of paying teen for explicit picsBBC responds after presenter accused of paying teenager for sexually explicit photos
Lire la suite »
Football ace fully focused on his futurePROFESSIONAL FOOTBALLER, University of East London alumnus, and presenter on BBC 1’s Football Focus, Liam...
Lire la suite »
Syria cancels BBC media accreditationThe move follows a BBC documentary that linked the president's family to the drug trade.
Lire la suite »